Saturday 12 January 2013

Media History oral Presentation


}What is history -“History is the witness that testifies to the passing of times; it illuminates reality … provides guidance in daily life, and brings us tidings of antiquity.” (Cicero, 106-43 BCE)}}What is Media? Media is a means of communication.  Types of media history, cultural determinism,  technological determinism and re-evaluations of media history. Media Histories has rival stands such as structure vs agency, technology vs society and history itself is progress from one medium to the next 


Through my research and Interview I conducted I found out a lot about the media history through my interviewee. And their own past media history As I interviewed a man named Alan Dunn who is my granddad aged 69. it helped me to understand the history from the past 50/60 years and the dramatic changes that have happened in the Media. I began the interview by asking him questions on the topics of television, radio, newspapers and general questions about his personal take on the Medias history. The answers he gave helped me to relate to the different types of Media history, Cultural determinism, technological determinism and re-evaluations of Media history. 

Media Histories has rival stands such as structure vs agency, technology vs society and history itself is progress from one medium to the next. With my interview these topics show through out and show a good understanding. Some questions I asked were: Did you read a lot? Did go to the cinema – and how often? What kind of films do you remember?  What was the spread of T.V years ago? Was radio the most popular audio medium and if so did you use to listen to the radio?  What were the popular T.V. programmes? What newspapers did you read? Etc.

From what I conducted I saw the Linear approach as its shows the different types of media history through time.
As for certain questions my interviewee gave me specific dates.  For example when I asked the question Can you remember a great change in media if so what? And was it a shock? He began to speak about the war being talked about on the radio after 1945 as it ended  and how live pictures and live news was now being shown on television. He said this was a big shock to him as he did not expect tv to change so dramatically and it helped them to know what was going on instead of just listening to the radio.

I then asked him about the cinema and how often he went. He mentioned an old cinema called ABC which does not exist anymore and that he would attend once a week as the cinema was very cheap back then compared to now around a shilling to watch any film.  This shows a dramatic change in revolution due to expense. I began to ask him about films and which ones he could remember. He mentioned the actor Carrie Grant and how he loved films with him in it. He talked about the film 39 steps and explained how different it was to films every decade and that film was getting better and better which relates to the idea of long revolution  I then asked more about tv and what it was like.

He mentioned the date 1957 when he remembers having a small wooden box type tv with only 1 or two channels such as the bbc. He also explained that over the years new tvs were coming out and the technology was gradually getting bigger. This explains the zig zag theory that old technologies and new technologies exist side by side or compete with each other and that new developments always link to pre-existing social formations and scientific ideas was said by Brian Winston.  I then asked what Was radio the most popular audio medium and if so did you use to listen to radio? He said that radio was the biggest thing in Media for years and that everybody would have had one. He said it was the way of him listening to news and it was his entertainment at the time as he did not have tv nor did many people just wireless radio transmitters.

He mentioned a radio programme called workers playtime due to WW11. He also remembered how Arther askey was always on the radio.   Then I started on the topic of culture and society and asked Do you think that media technology changes society and culture?  He started talking about when people would communicate through writing letters as a way of contact and how it stopped due to other technology coming about such as new ways of communication through telephones and then eventually the internet.  This changed society dramatically as people were acting different due to media changes.  This shows that culture determins history.

This shows the modelling change by Winston. As it transfers ideas to performance.  I then asked him did he think that Media was always changing or if their had been a break in history? He answered that media technology would get better and change more every decade. Which links in to long revolution as it is a part of an on going process (briggs) When I asked about telephones he talked about alexander Grayem Bell and mentioned when he was young he though the telephone was one of the best inventions in the media as you could talk to people anywhere

He said he didn’t get a telephone straight away and hardly anybody had phones either until after world war 11 and talked about how each phone was getting better and better through new technology and how great it it is now. This shows simple linear in telephone progress as it offers something new. The telephone lost its social impact over the years. I asked about magazines and he said they were hardly in colour but still good to read. 

Documentary case study on reality TV


      From the closing decades of the twentieth century was a period of significant change for broadcasting in the UK. An extremely large rise was shown in reality television and factual programming which led to a more commercial environment, a growth in the number of television channels, a fragmentation of audiences and the gradual erosion of public service broadcasting. “Audience sizes and ratings shares fell for current affairs and investigative documentary, a sober tradition of factual programming based on a professional production culture with roots in journalistic documentary.” (Bignell, 2011: 4) This quote expresses the change and rise in what is happening in documentary and what modern documentary is like. Many programmes today like: Big Brother and The Only Way Is Essex has changed the forms of documentary and made it fit into society today which has allowed a bigger and wider audience to enjoy programmes like these ones.

      Reality Television today is a new form of documentary which has a large audience. “The narratives, styles and approaches of popular factual entertainment shift documentary away from its traditional focus on argumentation and public education toward the pleasures and conventions of entertainment” (Beattie, 2004:203)This quote discusses the reason why popular entertainment programmes today allow the spectator to enjoy the programmes in a different way through the use of style and narrative. It also conveys that entertainment is now the key point in television.  A reality television programme which can relate to this one is Big brother. This is because the programmes entertainment levels are very high and still has its factual documentary conventions.  Such as the typical voice over throughout the show and the fact that some of it is scripted. The entertainment is very strong due to it being a live broadcasted show which to the spectator shows real life people living live on television so the audience can relate to them as they are ordinary people.

      ‘Engagement with real-life subjects is kept at a superficial level. The aim is that of diversion rather than enlightenment’ (Kilborn, 2003: 11) this quote shows that audiences engage more in the programme when it is shown in a real life setting. It also expresses that it brings a diverse audience together as the contestants on big brother are all different ages. This allows the spectator to engage and understand the contestants which shows a relation between them and the viewer. It also portrays to the audience a different outlook on life and shows different types of people to themselves.  It tries to make the audience understand different types of people and different life styles and educate them in the different cultures of people. It is also to give the viewer themselves confidence as they see ordinary people like themselves on television instead of the stereotypical celebrity stars they see on TV every day.

      As well as that reality television still shows traditional functions for documentary. For example Documentary is regarded as publicity and propaganda for dominant versions of citizenship and Big brother shows this through the use of different types of contestants.  Big brother is set out in a way to keep the audience entertained as much as possible. The house is specifically designed for eavesdropping which brings the show to a very personal level as we would here personal conversations between the contestants. ‘In the case of Big Brother, confession tends more to gossip than testimony thereby pushing confession further from any notion of an interview designed to complement or extend argumentation about the world’ (Beattie, 2004: 200) This also examines the personal level of big brother and discusses that confession shows a strong sense of argumentation when it comes to the world compared to an ordinary interview in a documentary.
Big brother is seen through the observational mode. It is a classic observation which brings in the viewer into the realms of the voyeuristic, which also allows access to the personal and private moments of Big brother. In classic observationalism the subject does not appear to be

      Performing; there is an attempt by both subject and director to treat speech and behaviour as ‘naturally’ as possible.” In popular factual entertainment, observation becomes the impetus for the non-professional to perform. (Beattie, 2004: 201) This quote expresses a difference in traditional documentary in a specific area. It examines the privileging of performance among the “ordinary” people who take part through a classical observational mode of convention. It also talks about trying to keep it as natural as possible towards the audience. This is because the more natural a programme is the more the entertainment value stands out and how the spectators can feel and relate to it more.

      When it comes to reality television there are many arguments today discussing what reality is? which raises questions about authenticity and in what sense such shows are ‘reality’ based ‘this emphasis on performance is so strong that it becomes a moot point as to whether one can accurately describe them as reality or actuality based’ (Kilborn,2003: 75)This examines the fact of performance. In reality television the contestants are performing as themselves which makes us question is it truly reality as the performance is them. This comes to the criticism of is the camera changing the way they would actually behave if it was not there and are they putting on an act just because it is TV?

      When it comes to factual entertainment and the documentary diversion when examining reality programmes to other traditional documentaries:  programme’s such as big brother and the only way is Essex do not address serious issues nor have a seriousness of purpose.  The main factor is always entertainment rather than a serious message.  Docu-soaps,  and  popular  factual  programming  in general  is  governed  by  what Kilborn calls “the entertainment imperative” (2003: 102). This shows Kilborns idea of the entertainment imperative and how he discusses the none serious side to reality programme’s and docudramas as it brings the audience closer to the people involved in the programmes.

    According to Kilborn (2003) reality-based TV and popular factual programmes are also characterised by “new ways of speaking to their audiences”  What he means by this is that television has come a long way from just ordinary documentary’s and now they can relate to their audience in many different ways through the use of reality programming.  Another point Kilborn made was that they are characterised by a 'light non-threatening mode': 'Given their entertainment priorities, docu-soaps are, above all, characterised by a lightness of tone' (2003: 104) This quote conveys the idea that programmes who fit the genre of reality television and factual entertainment programmes are all made for entertainment purposes and do not have a seriousness to them. When he talks about the lightness of tone he means that the programmes are not forceful or serious and they are for spectators to enjoy.

      The use of the voice documentary is still seen in a traditional way in some cases as the commentary spoken by an off-screen or unseen narrator has been regarded as  an integral  part  of  the  attempt  to  persuade  the  viewer  that  this  is  an authoritative speaker in control. However, most documentary’s focus closely on the “Voice of God” narration. Reality programmes still depend on the unseen voice but not in a serious manner like a typical documentary.
Big brother interacts with the wider definition of documentary. This is due to the conventions the programme has in relation to other documentary programmes. For example: Big brother has a voice over as does traditional documentary’s. It is seen through the classical observation mode which also many other documentaries are too.  The use of close up’s to show emotions and the different purposes which documentary’s show such as: to entertain, shock, educate and many more which Big brother does in different ways.

      The programme Big brother also uses the camera technique “fly on the wall” as the viewer can see the events happening just like a fly can. It is also possible for participants to be interviewed as well by an off screen voice. This is shown in big brother also as the contestants are seen in the Big brothers Diary room when talking to big brother. The spectator cannot see the interviewer just the interviewee. Fly on the wall grabs the viewer and makes them feel like they are watching from a very personal level.  When the spectator see’s the contestant in the diary room this is the most personal time in the house. This is because the contestant is on their own away from the other house mates but still on camera. Over the years contestants have cried, screamed and broke down talking to big brother. This shows a high level in the entertainment factor and this is why this programme is clever as audiences want to see the weak side of the contestants. Big brother allows this by the isolation and closure the contestants have from the outside world as they are closed off from everything such as family, friends, television, internet and many more.
      To conclude my essay when comparing reality television, factual programming and traditional documentary’s each show a relation through documentary. This is due to them all having the codes and conventions of which a documentary should have. Reality television is more for entertainment purposes to keep the audience on board but still has its documentary factors.  When the rise hit the UK in the 20TH century there was a great change in commercial environment when reality television and factual programming changed broadcasting.  More and more people began to watch programmes such as big brother and Made in Chelsea and the only way is Essex. This is because a wide range of audiences can relate to it. It also for fills the requirements of a documentary format in a contemporary society as it is up to date with the new world but still holds documentary traditions and allows space for a wider and bigger audience.


Bibliography
Beattie, Keith (2004) Documentary Screens: Non-Fiction Film and Television, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan

Bignell, Jonathan (2011) Docudramatizing the Real: Developments in British TV docudrama  Since1990 Studies in Documentary Film, 4

Kilborn, Richard (2003) Staging the Real: Factual TV Programming in the Age of Big Brother, Manchester: Manchester University Press.